Monday, January 19, 2015

Cricket World Cup 2015- Sequestering the Selectors



The margin of error in cricket is so slim, its almost shady. Please stand up and take notice of the two narratives below:
a) John had decided to play a defensive shot on the first ball and went on to score a century.John had the game of his life. He blasted every ball that came his way with elegant poise and steered his team to a much needed win. Father time has not yet managed to defeat John and it seems likely that he will continue to defy critics who are looking with an eagle eye for any signs of decline.
b) John had decided to hit the first ball out of the stadium and ended up being bowled. John is completely over the hill and needs to retire to make way for the next generation to assume the mantle from the old guard. It is sad to see a man living in denial, unable to accept that his presence is detrimental to the team. One needs to gracefully surrender to father time and walk away with dignity, instead of outliving their welcome and being dragged away.

Take a moment to soak in how silly it is that which of the above intros are printed in the next day's newspaper, can depend on a minuscule error in judgment. The entire narrative of a player's career can take a steep upward or a plummeting downward trajectory in the media based on how a player plays one ball, which subsequently opens the door to playing further deliveries which can result in a stellar performance. Or it opens the trapdoor below causing a downward slide towards purgatory.

The phrase "Over the hill" is perhaps being used too literally when it comes to the cricket team selection in India. Truth be told, there is no literal, specific point, past which a player's abilities begin a downward descent. There is no discernible moment post which a player's form takes a steep and constant decline. Form can fluctuate day to day and although players do eventually decline, their decline is almost always prematurely pronounced in the media.

"Seniors were also considered [for selection]. There was a discussion on everyone," said BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel. "But the thought process was to give preference to performers. The youngsters have been doing very well at the domestic level so they could not be ignored. Barring major injuries, the World Cup squad would be from this lot. Captain's views were also considered."

Here is the squad chosen to represent India at the World Cup- MS Dhoni (c), Shikhar Dhawan, Rohit Sharma, Virat Kohli, Suresh Raina, Ambati Rayudu, Ravindra Jadeja, Ravichandran Ashwin, Axar Patel, Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Ishant Sharma, Mohammed Shami, Stuart Binny, Umesh Yadav and Ajinkya Rahane.

"I would not like to comment at this [whether it is the end for Sehwag and Yuvraj in international cricket] level as I mentioned earlier. I think all of us should be happy that a lot of young cricketers have been considered for this, as a part of the probables. I feel that considering the future after the World Cup is also part of the thought process."- Sanjay Patel. Apparently Yuvraj's three centuries scored in the Ranji Trophy did not merit enough weight in the thought process.

As the saying goes, "There are three types of lies. Lies, damn lies and statistics." Numbers can be used as a Brahmastra to be the deciding factor in an argument. The conclusion they help derive also depends on who wields them. The sun was out for 12 hours today. It is clearly losing its sheen. We ought to find a different god to worship. 12 hours! Beat that. I am willing to bet that the above rationale was espoused some time or another in the past to denounce sun worshipers. If the sun is so powerful, why does it go 'lul' at night?

Coming back to earth, one of the reasons that Sachin Tendulkar found it so difficult to get his 100th century was a Prometheus sized burden placed by the expectations placed upon him. When the masses refer to you as God, and you aren't even a religious figure, that is a gargantuan weight by itself. Media scrutiny is a added weight. When a player proves time and time again that they deserve to represent the country, when they have rescued their team with brilliant performances time and time again, should we not give them the benefit of doubt?

Can we say that a series of consistently poor performances are evidence enough to condemn a player towards retirement? Is condemn too strong a word here? At some point the selectors need to play devil's advocate and put the name of some players in the Death Note. It is not an enviable job to decide if the idols of millions will get to play in the World Cup.

What if the selectors were insulated from all media coverage except the actual matches? Their only source of information would be the official scouting reports released by the team officials, match and practice footage, and statistics. No wisdom of pundits, no flaming editorials, no experts blowing hot air. Just plain, raw facts. Living in the information age, it seems inconceivable to envisage a situation such as this. We can't construct a Truman Show glass bowl to keep the selectors immune from the opinions of the masses. But something of this sort is being done and it has a name- Jury Sequestration.

In countries where legal cases are also tried by a jury of peers, if there is a chance that the jury can be unduly influenced by the media or otherwise, occasionally the jurors are sequestered. This measure is also used to avoid the chance of jurors being bribed, threatened or unduly persuaded.

I am not making the case for any particular player's inclusion here. I just feel very strongly that the media's influence holds sway with the selectors and it ought to be diminished in some way. Of course there are innumerable factors at play which determine who is selected. But it would be nice if in some way the influence of critics would play a smaller role.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Wild not giving Kyra Shroff Wild Card: Call for transparency


Its very easy to take up arms and rally around in a mob mentality against the establishment. Doubly so against sports establishments because there's a lot more room for subjectivity here. Every player, and by extension their well wishers, believe deep down that either they are the best in the business or that they will be with enough practice. Not every player can be afforded equal treatment however. There will always be players who feel that they aren't getting what is due to them in terms of opportunities and facilities.

Its very easy to go against the associations and berate them for overlooking a player, no matter which player is given the opportunity someone will always be left out. Over time however patterns begin to emerge, as in the case of Kyra Shroff, and you can't help but wonder if she is being denied a fair due.

Kyra being ranked 2nd in India after Sania Mirza, did not get a wild card from AITA to enter the WTA Challenger Series tournament in Pune.

The Women's Tennis Association has started a new format, WTA Challenger Series, for the benefit of the emerging markets who can't currently afford to host a full fledged WTA Premier or International event with all the bells and whistles. A WTA Challenger series was scheduled to happen in Pune starting today. I say was scheduled, it was almost a was and not an is because we couldn't afford to host the Challenger series at this time in Pune, but sponsors stepped in in the form of the Lakshya Group making the event possible.

All the organisers have invested around Rs. 1.5 crore for this event. The state government spent Rs. 40 lakh to re-surface the tennis courts, which have been largely unused since the 2008 Commonwealth Youth Games. 

The winner will get USD 25000 and 160 WTA ranking points. This is the first WTA event in India since 2008. Being a challenger series, top 50 players cannot participate in it. Allowing for lower ranked players to get a better shot at even competition.

Point being an event like this is pretty rare in India and very helpful to our budding talent to participate in.

_______________________________

The AITA had four wild card entries to give out to players of its choice. It was announced that two entries would go to the winner and runner up of the nationals and two others would be given in consideration of the sponsors. Kyra Shroff, ranked 2nd in India did not get wild card entry in this tournament. Here's a look at the disparity of rankings between Kyra and the other initial wild card considerations for this tournament:

Kyra Shroff- WTA rank 524. AITA rank 2
Rishika Sunkara- WTA rank 581, AITA rank 4
Prerna Bhambri- WTA rank 671. AITA rank 5
Rutaja Bhosle- WTA rank 704, AITA rank 7

Wild card by definition is arbitrary. Influenced by different factors in different cases. In this case, two wild card entries were being awarded keeping in mind the interest of the sponsors. The question is shouldn't the second best player in India be given at least one?

For the budding talent in India, getting to participate in this is a very big deal. They have a great opportunity to make a jump in their rankings even if they win one round. 

The AITA gave out wild card entries to Prerna Bhambri nationals winner(rank 5), nationals runner up Rishika Sunkara (Rank 4), junior national champion Prarthana Thombare and Andrea Pektovic. The rankings are as on 12 October. That would lead you to believe that nationals winners are given preference when it comes to giving wild card entries. But when Kyra won the nationals three years ago, she wasn't given a wild card entry as she wasn't ranked in the top three in India. A player's AITA rank ought to be a better measure of form than the nationals, since the rankings are decided by more than one competition. 

Kyra Shroff has won 12 Singles and 15 doubles AITA National level tournaments. She has won the Nationals U-10 karate championships as well. I mention that because multi sport athletes tend to have better potential, not to show the possibility of a roundhouse kick to the opponent in event of foul play.

At the last moment Kyra was offered a wild card draw in the qualifiers, which the Shroffs did not take up: "I refused politely because she was being offered a wild card into the qualifying rounds, Kyra based on her ranking of 524 would have managed to get into the qualify's without a Wild Card or any favours. We wanted based on her ranking a Wild Card into the main draw, which was denied inspite of being no 2 in the country." said Firdaus Shroff, her father and manager.

Having a wild card in the main draw would have given Kyra a shot to improve her rank by going up against relatively even competition. Getting a wild card in the qualifiers and getting one in the main draw are very different things.

Speaking to Firdaus Shroff, I've put together some instances which when taken together makes one stop at stare and question whether this young prodigy is being given her fair due. 

Maybe AITA is sticking by the current selection because they had made an announcement and can't back off?

"If the prior announcement of the wild card was such a point to stick by on part of the AITA, my question would be that in March 2012, AITA also announced the 4 probables for the London Olympic. Kyra based on her ranking was again the front runner. Why then was a person who was not part of the announced 4 chosen?"

Ok maybe the selections happen based on the training camp performance?

"In 2010 for the Commonwealth games, Kyra was in the probables and she went for the training camp but no one from the camp was selected. Instead a 29 year old player Nurupama was selected."
"For the Fed cup, Kyra went for the camp to Delhi in nov of 2011, she beat all the other girls at the camp which was for selection, but still Isha Lakhani was brought out off retirement to play."

I see a pattern emerging. Firdaus added "Also a very blatant disregard for players is that when the Olympic camp was held the kids were made to train on hard courts when the Olympics was to be played at Wimbledon on grass. There was a Swedish coach employed by AITA to train the kids, when Kyra arrived for the camp in Delhi she was the only one there. She was given in the heat of May a time slot of 12 pm to 2 pm to train in. Also the coach was using prime time of morning and evenings to train kids. Should the Olympic camp not have been given preference?"

When she won the nationals two years ago, she missed out on getting Rs 5 lac due to her as the winner. Apparently she had to apply for it, it wasn't handed out with the prizes at the podium. "When Kyra won the women's nationals in 2011, we were unaware that the winner was eligible to get Rs 5 lacs. It should be the responsibility of the AITA to guide players and their parents as to what they can get and what is possible to get. Not leave it to us to fend for ourselves. At present Col Chauhan of AITA is helping me with the ministry of sport to get something under the TSS scheme. Lets hope it happens. I have sent 2 applications under TSS and 1 under NSDF , and they have not borne any fruit till now." said Firdaus.

They say that ignorance of law is no defense in the court of law. But book of law is freely available online in different forms. The book of Getting Your Due As The Winner Of The Nationals is more elusive. Kyra missed out on the Rs 5 lac due to her as the winner of the nationals because she wasn't informed about it.

Firdaus said "Kyra is a diabetic, takes 4 shots of insulin daily. AITA knows this, still a proper diet was not provided for her. She had to go out to eat during the camp, is this the way our athletes are looked after?"

Sadly yes. Similar plight faced by our Paralympic team, but that got somewhere through a petition which was floated around onn Change.org. This seems to be more of an isolated case.
_______________________________

A good number of Challenger events is one of the major reasons why Europeans are dominating the tennis rankings. This is the first time India is hosting a WTA event since 2008. Having Kyra Shroff the 2nd ranked player in India participate in it would help her climb the rankings, get exposure and prove her mettle to the world. Instead there is a lot of wild speculation about the wild card and she has been left out.

Firdaus bemoans the same  "When will the youth or selection based on merit be done? When will Indian sports administrators learn that lives are at stake, we are struggling day and night to get our kids to a level, to represent their country, hold the flag up with pride, but all we have got till date is rejection and exclusion."

Murky waters here. Is jungle se hume bachao.


Tuesday, October 30, 2012

NBA Aaj Kal Highlights: 30 Oct, 2012


Welcome to the NBA Aaj Kal Highlights. Find video recaps and short reviews of the matches held on the previous day in this segment. Named Aaj Kal because of the time difference between India and USA. The next match on TV in India is on Sony SIX at 4:30 AM between the Nets and Knicks. Keep up with the schedule here:

NBA Schedule on TV in India

Here are the highlights of all of yesterday's matches:


Cleveland 94-84 Washington




How young is Kyrie Irving? He had his wisdom tooth removed last week and wasn't positive about playing his best because of it. The 21 year old still finished with 29 points to help lead the Cavaliers to a 94-84 win over the Washington Wizards. He had two key baskets late in the game, a driving layup and a long two to help stave off the Wizards. However depressing the end record of these teams may be, this was a spirited contest. Anderson Varejao of the Cavs set a personal best record with 23 rebounds in this game.








Miami 120-107 Boston




As fans we couldn't have asked for a better matchup in the Eastern Conference to start off the NBA season. The Miami Heat couldn't have asked for a better start either, raising their championship banners in the face of their rivals Celtics and then pummeling them 120-107

This was the 26th straight game where Rondo had at least 10 assists. He had 20 points, 13 assists and 7 rebounds here. LeBron had 26 points and 10 rebounds. But he left the game in the fourth quarter with cramps. But Wade added 29 points to the mix. And towards the end, Bosh had 7 straight points. He finished with 19 for the game. At one point Miami had a 19 point lead. They made a statement here with their win vs their arch rivals.

Kevin Garnett said he lost Ray Allen's phone number after Ray was traded. Ray had the Celtics number though as he sunk his first three of the game. Garnett made his statement to Allen by sulking before.






Mavericks 99- 91 Lakers


Steve Nash only had 7 points and 4 assists.




The Mavs had it doubly difficult as they made short business of the Lakers in LA


The Lakers shot themselves in the foot in this contest. All started off well, with the Lake show in full effect as they scored 29 points in the first quarter. But their poor free throw shooting did them in down the line. A paltry 12-31 from the charity stripe. Seems the ghost of Shaq descended to make Howard's debut miserable with his spirit of Shaqtacious free throws. Howard missed 11 of 14 free throws here.

Six Mavericks players scored in double figures and Dirk did not even play in this one. Poor debut for the Lakers. But there was one play where Gasol drove in like a guard and dished it off to Howard after drawing the defense to him. Scary, scary play if the two of them can keep doing it.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Running the Mumbai Marathon 2012


It can be disconcerting to someone new to Mumbai to try and greet the sun. My first morning in Mumbai felt like being in the Twilight zone. It was dark outside at 7 am in the morning. I remember checking my watch, the time on my mobile, and even considered booting the laptop to triple check the time. In North Eastern India the sun can wave hello as early as 4 am. Kolkata lights up sometime well before 5. And this city was still plunged in darkness at 7!

That is a dream scenario for those who want to train early in the morning. And for the open marathon run itself. Mumbai Marathon began earlier in the morning for the Amateur run, 5:40 AM. Kolkata had flagged off at 7 AM in contrast.

First thing I did in Mumbai, seek out Jogger's park. Twilight zone again. There were people walking, jogging, and even running! All around a track. These people were not coming or going anywhere, they were just going round and round in circles. Coming from Kolkata where a road runner is looked upon as a baggage snatcher or a robber fleeing a crime scene, I felt like an alien among brothers among all these runners.
Click on the image for the full map
 All train tracks lead to CST. That's where the race flagged off. I imagine it had been flagged off, never really saw any indication that the race had started. The start was ambiguous. The beginning of races are always nerve wracking. Heart pounding. Usain Bolt will attest to that. In this race, we were herded together in a field and then released on to the road. Just walking along on that road, I was hoping to hear some siren signaling the start of the race. Maybe a gunshot. Nothing of the sort. It was like going out for a stroll, at one point I asked a fellow runner if the race had started. Just walking along and then people started to run. Up ahead there was the start line under a gate arch, so I knew when to start my stopwatch at least.

Having run my last marathon in 4:30, this time I had set a personal deadline of 3:30 and my dream was to do it in 3 flat. I ended up finishing in 3:31. Maybe if I had set a minimum goal of 3 hours and gone for 2:30 I may have improved my timing. Teaches one to aim so high that you're bending over backwards when you shoot.
At the beginning of the race I felt like a right stud. Running ahead and overtaking people. I didn't get high on that knowing that those who are fast have already gone way ahead of me. I ran the first hour at 14 km/hr, 2nd hour at about 13. Average speed of 12.05 km/hr for the entire race. Not too shabby. Nothing to be proud of if you are aiming higher.

While the pace I set for myself was a comfortable enough one at 14 km/hr, maybe being conservative and going at a speed of 13 km/hr might have let me finish in 3:15. But then I'd be berating myself  with what ifs. What if I had gone faster? So yeah, go for broke!

What really surprised me about this marathon, it had an audience. My frame of reference is just the Kolkata marathon, crowd there consisted of people going about their daily business. Down here in Mumbai, people were out and about in good numbers standing around and cheering on the runners at five thirty in the morning. Later when I mentioned this to my colleagues they laughed and said that the reason so many people were out was to ogle maal and not cheer on the runners. Lechers do abound everywhere but the crowd I saw was there for the right reasons. Later on, towards the end of the race, people were on hand handing out fruit, biscuits and refreshments. I was beyond hungry at that point. Without those helpful citizens, I'd have taken a lot longer to finish.

Picture running on this with fog obscuring everything
One stretch of the run overwhelmed me completely. The Bandra Worli Sea Link. More so than fatigue, I was torn with the urge to stop and just stare and soak that scene in. When I first heard of the sea link, I misheard sea link for ceiling. But as I ran across it, ceiling seemed like an apt name for the bridge. Stairway to heaven fits it better. The pic to your right taken later doesn't do it justice. Early in the morning you can't see the water below. Only fog. Felt like running on a suspended platform floating in the sky, leading to heaven. This surreal image is indelibly tattooed in my memory as one of the most beautiful visions of my life. Chasing the horizon one step at a time.

That bridge is one of a kind in India. When it was inaugurated it was also open to pedestrians and cycles for a week before being closed to them for good. Now if you want to walk on it you have to show that you are willing to cover a marathon of a distance to do so. The only way to experience the ceiling of stairway to heaven is to run in the Mumbai marathon. The opportunity arises once a year.

I reached the bridge sometime after the first hour. The half marathon runners were coming down the opposite way as I was crossing the sea link. A lot of them clapped and flashed thumbs up to the full marathon runners. The sea link is a recent inclusion in the marathon. AFI president Adille Sumariwalla had been in favour of it for a while:  "Since the general public or spectators will not be allowed on the sea link, the athletes will be by themselves throughout this 5.6km stretch. This will give them the opportunity to strategise and could well decide the race leader or even the winner."

To sum up, here's what I took from that quote: Cut throat competition. No crowd, no witnesses. Bridge can decide outcome of race. Athletes will be by themselves. Noone watching. Running across a 5.6km stretch over water which can swallow all that's thrown in it.
A little stretch of road rash style free for all where the marathon runners try to throw the competition overboard using banana peels and throwing elbows!

After the 28 km mark, I was joined in running by rats running around in my tummy. If I had spotted a kid with ice cream or chocolates, I'd have purloined it in an instant. I was already in motion at about 13 km/hr. Wouldn't be much of a stretch to reach out and grab it. Tiny kid wouldn't be able to chase me on those stumpy legs. No toddler with truffles appeared so I had to settle for the bananas being provided to the runners.

The thing about the internet is that it gives you a hundred opinions and lets you make up your mind. I came across different opinions on what one should eat before a race. I figured the only way I could be sure of what the right way is, is through experience. So I just downed some fruits to avoid a full stomach. Bad choice. Hunger pangs kept stabbing at my tummy.

There was a foreigner who was keeping pace with me from around the 20ish mark and we ran together till the 35 km mark. I half expected the bystanders to cheer me on, Go India or something else which doesn't sound so fundamentalist. If this were the elite run, they would have. Why discriminate here? Instead, people were egging him on. "Come on uncle!" Ok so he was older than me and maybe that's why people were cheering him on. Would the same people cheer me on when I grab a bottle from a toddler? I'm older after all, and my need is far greater than overfed chubby cheeks.
He started to distance himself from me after the 35km mark. Hat tip to the guys who scoff at age and keep running. Now I wish I had tried to keep pace with him.

Over 90% of the earth is water. So where is it when you need it? Seems every marathon I run there's some clowning around with my water. In the Kolkata marathon, there was a girl standing with a glass of water at around the 39 km mark. I wish she had remained standing while she handed the glass to me. These volunteers were instructed to run along with the runners and hand the glass over like exchanging a baton in a relay race. So that girl started running faster than me while holding out the glass of water as if to say "Come and get it". Looking at my tongue hanging out and frantic motions to her to hand the damn glass over already, she realized this isn't the time to be Bolt and relented her breakneck pace.

Tongue hanging out, approaching a water station like a deserted desert traveller hoping you aren't looking at a mirage. Towards the end of marathons your self control ebbs away. You're just looking for a reason to slow down or stop to end the pain. I'd never stop outright for whatever reason. Even crawl along if need be. Stopping to punch someone who's begging for it might be a worthy reason, I really got one here.
That was towards the end of the race. I was beyond exhausted at this point. And thirsty enough to snatch a bottle from a baby in a stroller. Babies are the best to steal stuff from. All they can do is howl, which they do irrespective of bottle thivery. Mommy will just think that the kid is just crying for no reason. Babies take note, don't cry wolf. If you do no one will listen when a thirsty despo marathon runner comes along and snatches your stuff.

I thought that was the worst refreshment related experience I could have in a marathon. Having the refreshment run away from me literally. Well, worse than having to chase a bottle while a girl eggs you on, is having a bottle of water thrown at your nuts.

Towards the end of the Mumbai Marathon, I approached the first water stand and missed the bottles since the volunteers were empty handed/serving others. Ditto at the next stand. Third time being the charm, the volunteer with the bottle said "Howdy! Catch!" and hurled a pointy bottle at my nuts.

Giving him the most "WTF were you thinking" look I could muster I moved on. Maybe if I had punched him the adrenaline rush could have boosted my speed. But throwing the punch would have drained me more. Plus with bystanders around I might have been mobbed. Not that I considered the pros and cons of a punch in such detail at the time. Instinct said move on, so I did.

The last 8 km were the hardest. I slowed down to the point where my speed dipped to a brisk walk. So I walked a little for a couple of minutes. I remember reading in a book of ultramarathon running that first timers ought to alternate between a walk and a jog in a ultra race. There was something to be said for that. I got my second wind and began jogging again.
After a point the full and half marathon routes converged and I couldn't make out which runners are in the full with me and which are in the half. For the most part the half marathon runners were easy to identify, younger/older/fresher/slower/faster, you could tell which ones are in the half marathon, but hard to tell which are in the full.

The last km of the race threw me off. The road was divided into two parallel tracks and I saw runners coming back from the one opposite to the one I was in. I assumed that I would have to go ahead and then circle all the way back. That made my footsteps a little heavier. Some way ahead though, I saw the words 400m on the road. Then 300m. Realizing that the race is almost over and I may just make it in 3:30 I started to sprint ahead, all fatigue forgotten. Made it dot at 3:31.

Finishing the Marathon was half the battle. In this respect finishing it in Kolkata was a lot better. There was no visible finish line for stragglers in Kolkata. Everyone had packed up and emptied the area around the finish line. In Mumbai, the finishers had to stand in a heavy line for minutes before they could make their way back to the holding area. That was not fun. After a marathon all you want to do is either plop down and stretch or just walk around. Here we had to trudge along in a long line to the holding area.
Once there, it resembled a war zone. Runners in varying degrees of fatigue and physical damage were getting treatment here and there. moving forward there were stalls where the finishers were given refreshments, and a finisher's medal was put around my neck. We then had to walk all the way across the field to get to the road, I ended up walking with some other finishers of the half marathon. We got talking and they were in awe of my timing saying that their running coach himself only does about 3:30 himself. That perked me up a lot but it still didn't feel like too much of an accomplishment.
Doing a little research online put it into perspective.
  • sub 3:00 finishers - 55 (3.8%)
    only 5 non-elite sub 3:00 finishers
  • sub-4:00 finishers – 179 (12.4%)
    124 runners finished between 3:00 and 4:00
I was in among the top 100 of the 1895 runners who participated in the full marathon.
This is the biggest marathon in India. There were over  38842 runners total in the dream run, full and half marathon, wheel chair including amateurs and senior citizens. With my time, I finished around 40th in the amateur category. which had a little under 1895 runners, excluding the couple hundred of elite runners.

Hopefully, the next marathon I run in, I'll crack the 3 hour barrier. That would be something to take pride in.
Here is a comparison of the two full marathons I've experienced:

Kolkata, 2010Mumbai, 2012
Timing4:303:31
RefreshmentsWater and glucose.Water, glucose, biscuits, and fruits.
VolunteersSmall in number.Very many.
CrowdPeople going about their businessPeople coming out to cheer and give out refreshments.
RouteWide and encompassing a bigger area.Up and down, smaller area but the Sea Link is priceless.
WeatherNot cool enough, race started at 7 AM.Early start at 5:40, overcast skies.
TrafficAfter the 3 hour mark, barricades were lifted, had to run in traffic. Cops did make way at intersectionsTraffic of runners. When half and full marathon crowd merged, wasn't much room towards the end
ParticipantsSparse in number. Mostly casual runners who dropped out halfway.All shapes and sizes.